Skip to main content

WRONGFUL RESTRAINT AND CONFINEMENT (Section 339-340)

WRONGFUL RESTRAINT AND CONFINEMENT (Section 339-340)

Wrongful restraint and wrongful confinement are two offences according to the I.P.C. under Sec- 339 and 340, which punishes the individuals for the violation of a person's movements.

Wrongful restraint (Section 339):

A person who voluntarily obstructs another, so as to prevent him from proceeding in any direction in which that person had a right to go, is guilty of wrongful restraint.

Exception:
A person who, in good faith, believes that he has a right to pass.

Eg:
1) A removed the ladder and prevented B from getting down the roof of a

house.
2) A builds a wall across a path along which B had a right to pass.

In all these cases the accused is guilty of wrongful restraint.

Punishment (Sec- 341):

Sec-341 provides punishment for wrongful restraint.
It is simple imprisonment for a term, which may extend to one month or with a fine which may extend up to Rs.500 or both.



page1image389950512 page1image389950800 page1image389951088 page1image389951440 page1image389951728 page1image389952016

In Sobha Rani V

The King

The accused a landlord obstructed or prevented the tenant from using the bath room.
The accused was held guilty of wrongful restraint under Sec-339.

Wrongful confinement (Section 340):

A person who wrongfully restraints any person in such a manner as to prevent that person from proceeding beyond certain circumscribing limits is guilty of wrongful confinement.

Eg:

  1. 1)  A causes Z to go within a walled space and locks Z in.

    Z is thus prevented from proceeding in any direction beyond the

    circumscribing line of the wall. A is guilty.

  2. 2)  A keeps his men with guns and warns Z that if he ever tries to leave the

    building they would kill him. A is guilty.

    Punishment (Sec-342):

This depends on how many days a person is confined by the accused. Sec- 342 provides punishment for confinement even for a single hour. The punishment is one year imprisonment or fine of Rs.1000/- or both.

In BhimSingh V

State of Jammu and Kashmir

In this case, an MLA of Jammu and Kashmir Assembly was awarded an exemplary damage of Rs.50, 000/- by the Supreme Court for the unlawful arrest.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Types of Punishments

Punishments: The punishments, to which the offenders are liable under the provisions of Indian Penal Code 1860, are: 1) Death Penalty or Capital Punishment 2) Life Imprisonment 3) Imprisonment a) Rigorous b) Simple 4) Forfeiture 5) Fine 1. Death Penalty or Capital Punishment: It is the most serious nature of punishment. Some Countries abolished it. It is awarded in India in certain exceptional cases. The offences which are punishable with death sentence under the Indian Penal code includes: a) Waging war against the Government of India (Sec-121) b) Abetting Mutiny that is actually committed (Sec-132) c) Giving or Fabricating false Evidence upon which an innocent person suffers death (Sec-194) d) Murder (Sec- 302) e) Abetment of Suicide of a minor or of a insane or of an intoxicated person (Sec-305) f) Attempt to Murder by a person under the sentence of Imprisonment for life, if hurt is caused (Sec-307) g) Punishment for repeat offenders (previously convicted for an offence punishable u...
Post a Comment
Read more

UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY, RIOT, AFFRAY

Unlawful Assembly (Section 141): Unlawful assembly is an assembly of 5 or more persons with the common object: 1)  to over-throw by criminal force the Government or the legislature or 2)  To resist the execution of any legal process 3)  To commit mischief (Sec-425), criminal trespass (441) 4)  To obtain property or right by criminal force or 5)  To criminally force a person to do an act which he is not bound to do, or to force him not to do an act which he is bound to do. If a person is a member of an unlawful assembly then that person is punishable. An assembly which is not unlawful in the beginning may become unlawful subsequently. The purpose or common object decides the nature of the assembly. Essentials: 1)  The essentials are that there should be five or more persons and there should be the common object as specified in Sec-141. 2)  This is different from common intention in Sec-34. For unlawful assembly prior meeting of minds is not essential. 3...
Post a Comment
Read more

Right of Private defence

The Right of Private defense: (Section 96 to 106): One of the fundamental principles of law is that every individual has a right to defend himself and his property. This is the doctrine of self-defense or self-preservation. Sec. 96 to 106 has recognized this rule and have provided for the limits within which it may be exercised. This may be discussed under two heads: a) Right of person b) Right of property 1. Right of person: A) Every person has a right to defend his own body and the body of any other person against any person. (Sec-97) B) Against a madman etc: The right extends in all circumstances against anyperson who is insane, drunk or who by a reason of youth immaturity is excused under law (Sec- 98) Eg: Z under madness attempts to kill A.A may defend and even kill Z if circumstances so warrant. C) Extension of the right: Sec-100 provides as follows :A person who is under a reasonable apprehension that his life is in danger,may to defend himself, voluntarily cause the death of th...
Post a Comment
Read more