Skip to main content

Criminal Breach of Trust & Misappropriation of Property

Criminal Misappropriation (Section 403):

A person who dishonestly misappropriates or converts for his own use any movable property, is guilty of criminal misappropriation of property. The punishment is imprisonment for two years or fine or both. A dishonest misappropriation for a small interval of time also amounts to misappropriation. If the person takes the property to protect it or to restore it from the owner, he is not guilty. But if he does not restore it and if he does not return the owner using reasonable means, he becomes guilty.



Eg:

1) A finds a bundle of currency notes on the highway. He picks up the bundle with an intention to hand it over to the real owner. He is not guilty. But after taking home he changes his mind and uses for his own purposes. He is guilty when he changes his mind.

2) A finds a valuable ring on the road, A takes it without any idea of finding the owner and handing it over to him. He is guilty.

3) A and B are joint owners, A sells the house without B's consent and appropriates the entire amount for himself. He is guilty of criminal misappropriation.

Criminal breach of Trust (Sec-405):

Sec- 405 makes the criminal breach of trust an offense.

If a person, entrusted with the property, or any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use or disposes of, against law he is guilty of criminal breach of trust. This is embezzlement according to English law. It is important that the property must be" entrusted to the accused, and he must dishonestly misappropriate it”. If Persons entrusted dishonestly misappropriate, they are guilty.

Eg:

1) In Prize competition, the prize winners were not given the prizes. A was tried on the ground of criminal breach of trust.

2) A, a revenue cashier, appropriates Rs. 5000 instead of remitting to the treasury. This is criminal breach of trust.

Ramaswamy Nadar

V

State of Madras,

The Supreme Court held that there was no breach of trust, as he had not appropriated any money for his own purposes.

Dalmia

 V

 Delhi Administration

One partner was given authority by other partners to collect the property of the firm, he is entrusted with dominion over property & if he dishonestly misappropriates, he is guilty of criminal breach of trust.

Punishment (Sec-406):

Imprisonment up to 3 years or fine or both.





Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Types of Punishments

Punishments: The punishments, to which the offenders are liable under the provisions of Indian Penal Code 1860, are: 1) Death Penalty or Capital Punishment 2) Life Imprisonment 3) Imprisonment a) Rigorous b) Simple 4) Forfeiture 5) Fine 1. Death Penalty or Capital Punishment: It is the most serious nature of punishment. Some Countries abolished it. It is awarded in India in certain exceptional cases. The offences which are punishable with death sentence under the Indian Penal code includes: a) Waging war against the Government of India (Sec-121) b) Abetting Mutiny that is actually committed (Sec-132) c) Giving or Fabricating false Evidence upon which an innocent person suffers death (Sec-194) d) Murder (Sec- 302) e) Abetment of Suicide of a minor or of a insane or of an intoxicated person (Sec-305) f) Attempt to Murder by a person under the sentence of Imprisonment for life, if hurt is caused (Sec-307) g) Punishment for repeat offenders (previously convicted for an offence punishable u...
Post a Comment
Read more

Essentials of Forgery

Forgery: (Section 463) There are two sections defining forgery. 1) Sec- 463 defines forgery 2) Sec- 464 defines Making a false document 1. Forgery: A person who makes a false document or part of it with an intention: 1) to cause damage or injury to the public or to any person 2) to support any claim or title 3) to cause any person to part with property or enter into contract 4) to commit fraud or that fraud may be committed - is guilty of forgery; 2. False Document: A person is said to make a false document in the following circumstances: 1) He must dishonestly or fraudulently, make, sign, seal or execute a document, with knowledge or an intention to make others believe that it was genuinely done by the concerned authority. 2) The person, without lawful authority, dishonestly or fraudulently cancels, or alters the document made by himself or by any other (living or not). 3) The person may cause any other person who is insane or intoxicated or deceived, to sign or seal or execute or alt...
Post a Comment
Read more

Theories of Punishment

 Theories of Punishment: Imposing punishment upon the wrong doer was recognized from the time of immemorial. In olden days, severe punishment was imposed for smaller offence. As the civilization developed, the attitude towards the imposing of the punishment has been changed. Gandhi said, “Hate the Sin, but not the Sinner” Like this, other philosophers showed mercy upon the criminals and started analyzing the Socio-economic circumstances behind the incident of the offence. Their views are classified into: 1) Deterrent Theory 2) Retributive Theory 3) Reformative Theory 4) Preventive Theory 5) Expiatory Theory 1. Deterrent Theory: According to this theory, the punishment given to a wrong doer must be as hard as possible so that it may set an example who commits the same. That is, it not only punishes a particular person but it also directs punishment to the other possible criminals. The deterrent theory creates some kind of fear in the mind of other by providing an adequate penalty an...
Post a Comment
Read more