Skip to main content

Directive Principles of State Policy (Article 36 -51)

Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP)
(Article 36 -51)

It includes:
  1. Welfare of the State
  2. State makes law and policies
  3. Social Justice
Article 38 says about Welfare policy.



Introduction:

To implement the ideals, to achieve the goals that is srinked in the preamble of the constitution, to establish a welfare state, fundamental rights and the Directive Principles of state policy has been provided in the constitution.

Part-4 of the constitution, Article 36-51 lays down various provisions.
Directive principles of state policy have been borrowed from the constitution of Ireland in 1937.

They are the fundamental in the governance of the country, they are known as Positive or Negative rights.


Classification of Directive Principles of State Policy:

  1. Social and Economic Charter
  2. Social Security Charter
  3. Community Welfare Charter
Social and Economic Charter:

Article- 38 says about Social Order
Article- 39 says about Securing Economic Justice

Social Security Charter:

Article – 39A: Equal justice and free legal Aid to the economically 
Backward classes.

Article – 41: Just and Human Conditions of the work

Article – 42: Right to work, education and public assistance in certain 
  Cases

Article – 43: Participation of the workers in the Management of 
Industries.

Article - 45: Compulsory education for children. 

Article – 46: Promotion of educational and economic interest of the 
Weaker sections.

Article – 47: Duty to raise the standard of living and improvement of 
the health. 

Community Welfare Charter:

Article – 44: Uniform civil code

Article – 48: Organization of agriculture and animal husbandry.

Article – 48A: Protection and improvement of forests and wild life.

Article – 51: Promotion of International peace and security.

Relation between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State policy: 
  1. First View: Fundamental Rights to DPSP
  2. Second View:         DPSP to Fundamental Rights
  3. Third View: Balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP
First View:
Fundamental Right to DPSP:
Fundamental rights are enforceable and hence they would prevail over DPSP.

In State of Madras
V
Champakam Dorairanjan

The Supreme Court held that, in the case of any conflict between the fundamental rights and DPSP, the fundamental right would prevail over DPSP.

Second View:
DPSP to Fundamental Rights:

According to this view, DPSP being the Social Rights should be preferred on the grounds that the equal rights may be out weighted in the entrance of the society.


In Kesavnanda Bharti
V
State of Kerala

The Supreme Court held that, the parliament is empowered to amend the fundamental rights to give the effect to DPSP.

Third View:
Balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP:

The Supreme Court accepted the importance of DPSP and tried to harmonize the DPSP with Fundamental Rights.

In Kerala Education Bill (1957)

The Supreme Court observed that through the DPSP cannot over rite the fundamental rights but in order to determine the scope ambience of the fundamental rights, the DPSP cannot be ignored.

Therefore the principles of harmonious construction were adopted to give effect to both.
In      Mohini Jain
    V
State of Karnataka

In this case, the petition of Mohini Jain challenged the Karnataka Educational Institution.
The petitioner was denied of admission as she could not afford to pay such heavy fees.
The Supreme Court held that charging such heavy fees amount to deny the Right to Education, which is the violation of Personal liberty under Article-21.

In Olga Telis
V
Bombay Municipal Corporation

It was held that, life under Article-21 includes Right to livelihood.
No person can live without the means of livelihood.
The right to livelihood is not treated as a part and parcel of the constitution.
The easiest way to deprive a person of his right to life is to deprive him of his right to livelihood.

In Minerva Mills
V
Union of India

In this case, both Fundamental rights and DPSP are equal.

Hope you enjoy reading!!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Offences Relating to Marriage , Adultery and Bigamy

Offences Relating to Marriage (Section 493 to 498): Sec-493 to 498 of IPC deals with the offences relating to the marriages, they are: a) Mock Marriage b) Bigamy c) Adultery 1. Mock Marriage: Mock Marriage means Invalid marriage. It is a sexual intercourse by a man with a married or unmarried woman of any age, whom he induces to be his wife, but in fact he is a concubine. It shall be punished with an Imprisonment up to 10 years and fine. Ingredients: a) The accused has done sexual intercourse with the prosecution. b) He has not legally married to her. c) She has given a consent for sexual intercourse believing that he would marry. d) Such belief in her was induced by the accused. Marriage ceremony fraudulently done without lawful marriage (Sec-496): As per sec-496, Whoever dishonestly or with a fraudulent intention has gone through the ceremony of being married, knowing that he is not been lawfully married, shall be punished with an Imprisonment up to 7 years with fine. Ingredients: a)...

Law relating to Abetment (Section 107 to 120)

Law relating to Abetment explanation and also when an abetment committed outside India is said to be an offence committed in India? Abetment: (Section 107 to 120): A person abets the doing of a thing if he: 1) Instigates another to do that thing, or 2) Conspires with others in the doing of-the act or 3) Intentionally aids the doing of that thing E.g: A, a police officer, with a Warrant is empowered to arrest Z. B, who knew this, instigated A to arrest C who he mis-represented as Z. A arrests C. B abets. General advice is not abetment. Abetment by instigation: Instigation means the instigator actively suggests, or stimulates by any means i.e., by words, hints, encouragement etc. Abetment by conspiracy: For this there should be at least two persons, engaged in commission of an act in pursuance of conspiracy and there should be the doing of the thing. Abetment by aid: The person aids to facilitate commission of an offence. It should be intentional aid. E.g: supplying of food to facilitate...

UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY, RIOT, AFFRAY

Unlawful Assembly (Section 141): Unlawful assembly is an assembly of 5 or more persons with the common object: 1)  to over-throw by criminal force the Government or the legislature or 2)  To resist the execution of any legal process 3)  To commit mischief (Sec-425), criminal trespass (441) 4)  To obtain property or right by criminal force or 5)  To criminally force a person to do an act which he is not bound to do, or to force him not to do an act which he is bound to do. If a person is a member of an unlawful assembly then that person is punishable. An assembly which is not unlawful in the beginning may become unlawful subsequently. The purpose or common object decides the nature of the assembly. Essentials: 1)  The essentials are that there should be five or more persons and there should be the common object as specified in Sec-141. 2)  This is different from common intention in Sec-34. For unlawful assembly prior meeting of minds is not essential. 3...