Skip to main content

Article 31

 Article 31 Right to Property

The right to property was a fundamental right that was omitted by the constitution (44th Amendment) Act 1978.

The amendment abolished the right to property as a fundamental right and incorporated as a constitutional right to be regulated by the ordinary law. It inserted a new chapter-4 i.e., Right to Property in part 12 of the constitution.

The chapter has now only one Article 300A. There are certain exceptions or limitations enshrined under Article-31A to 31D. In other words, Article-31A, 31B, 31C and 31D of the Indian Constitution provides immunity to certain laws from being challenged.

Articles 31A, 31B, 31C and 31D deals with the “Saving of Certain Law” that is explained in:

  1. 31(A) Saving of laws providing for the Acquisition of Estates etc
  2. 31 (B) Validations of certain Acts and Regulations
  3. 31(C) Saving of laws giving effect to certain directive principles.
  4. 31(D) Saving of laws in respect to Anti-National Activities



31(A) Saving of laws providing for the Acquisition of Estates etc:

Article-31(A) was added by the constitution (First Amendment) Act 1951.

It provides that, any law which is passed for the acquisition of any estate or modification of any such right shall not be void on the grounds that it abridges any rights, which are conferred by Article-14 or Article-19 of the constitution.The main object of Article-31A if to facilitate the Agrarian Reforms and to validate the acquisition of the Zamindars.

In Vajaralu

 V

Special Deputy Collector

It has been observed that the protection of Artcle-31A is not applicable to the law which seeks to modify the right of the owner without any reference to Agrarian Reforms.

In Amar Singh

V

State of Rajasthan

It has been observed that the Rajasthan Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagir Act 1952, is one for the acquisition of the property and is within the legislative competence of the state and is protected by the Article- 31A of the Constitution.

31 (B) Validations of certain Acts and Regulations:

Article-31B was added by the constitution (First Amendment) Act 1951, in the 9th schedule. The object was to protect certain acts and regulations from being void on the grounds of their being violation of fundamental rights. Article-31B has been held to be a constitutional device to place the specified statutes beyond any attack on the grounds that they infringe the Part-3 of the constitution.

In Waman Rao

V

Union of India

The Supreme Court held that the amendment made to the constitution before 24/4/1973 which added the entries to the 9th schedule are void.

31(C) Saving of laws giving effect to certain directive principles:

Article-31C was added by the constitution (25th Amendment) Act 1971.It empowers the Parliament as well as the state legislatures to enact the laws towards securing the Directive Principles that is specified in Article-39(b) and 39(c) of the constitution.

Such laws cannot be challenged on the grounds that they infringe the fundamental rights that were guaranteed under Article-14 to 19 of the constitution. Thus, Article-31C gives priority to the Directive Principles contained in Article39(b) and (c) over the fundamental rights guaranteed under Article-14 and 19 of the constitution.

In Kesavnanda Bharti

V

State of Kerala

The court held that the declaratory clause in Article-31C was unconstitutional as it was destructive of the basic feature of the constitution i.e., the Judicial Review. Article-31C was amended by the constitution (42nd Amendment) Act 1976, for widening its (Article-31C) scope, covering all the directive principles for giving the immunity to all the legislations in pursuance of the directive principles from being attacked invoking Article-14, 19 and 31.

In Minerva Mills Ltd

V

Union of India

The validity of 42nd Amendment, which enlarges the scope of Article-31C, was challenged. The Supreme Court held that the 42nd Amendment was void to an extent that it enlarged the Article-31C beyond 25th Amendment Act 1971.

31(D) Saving of laws in respect to Anti-National Activities:

Article-31D was inserted in the constitution conferring on the parliament to make the laws to prevent the formation of the Anti- National Associations.However, the Article-31D was omitted by the constitution (42nd Amendment) Act 1977.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Offences Relating to Marriage , Adultery and Bigamy

Offences Relating to Marriage (Section 493 to 498): Sec-493 to 498 of IPC deals with the offences relating to the marriages, they are: a) Mock Marriage b) Bigamy c) Adultery 1. Mock Marriage: Mock Marriage means Invalid marriage. It is a sexual intercourse by a man with a married or unmarried woman of any age, whom he induces to be his wife, but in fact he is a concubine. It shall be punished with an Imprisonment up to 10 years and fine. Ingredients: a) The accused has done sexual intercourse with the prosecution. b) He has not legally married to her. c) She has given a consent for sexual intercourse believing that he would marry. d) Such belief in her was induced by the accused. Marriage ceremony fraudulently done without lawful marriage (Sec-496): As per sec-496, Whoever dishonestly or with a fraudulent intention has gone through the ceremony of being married, knowing that he is not been lawfully married, shall be punished with an Imprisonment up to 7 years with fine. Ingredients: a)...

Law relating to Abetment (Section 107 to 120)

Law relating to Abetment explanation and also when an abetment committed outside India is said to be an offence committed in India? Abetment: (Section 107 to 120): A person abets the doing of a thing if he: 1) Instigates another to do that thing, or 2) Conspires with others in the doing of-the act or 3) Intentionally aids the doing of that thing E.g: A, a police officer, with a Warrant is empowered to arrest Z. B, who knew this, instigated A to arrest C who he mis-represented as Z. A arrests C. B abets. General advice is not abetment. Abetment by instigation: Instigation means the instigator actively suggests, or stimulates by any means i.e., by words, hints, encouragement etc. Abetment by conspiracy: For this there should be at least two persons, engaged in commission of an act in pursuance of conspiracy and there should be the doing of the thing. Abetment by aid: The person aids to facilitate commission of an offence. It should be intentional aid. E.g: supplying of food to facilitate...

UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY, RIOT, AFFRAY

Unlawful Assembly (Section 141): Unlawful assembly is an assembly of 5 or more persons with the common object: 1)  to over-throw by criminal force the Government or the legislature or 2)  To resist the execution of any legal process 3)  To commit mischief (Sec-425), criminal trespass (441) 4)  To obtain property or right by criminal force or 5)  To criminally force a person to do an act which he is not bound to do, or to force him not to do an act which he is bound to do. If a person is a member of an unlawful assembly then that person is punishable. An assembly which is not unlawful in the beginning may become unlawful subsequently. The purpose or common object decides the nature of the assembly. Essentials: 1)  The essentials are that there should be five or more persons and there should be the common object as specified in Sec-141. 2)  This is different from common intention in Sec-34. For unlawful assembly prior meeting of minds is not essential. 3...