Skip to main content

Insanity (Section 84)

 Insanity (Sec-84)

Act of a person of unsound mind is given under Sec-84 as,
“Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who, at the time of doing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act or that what he is doing is either wrong or contrary to law”

The law of Insanity was introduced by a leading case of McNaughton.

In R V

Mc. Naughten


Facts:

Daniel Mc. Naughten the accused, murdered Mr. Drummond, the private secretary of Sir. Robert Peel, the Prime Minister of England, by confusion that Mr. Drummond was Sir. Robert Peel.

He was tried for murder.
On behalf of the accused, the defense counsel pleaded that, the accused due to the insanity, he was not able to know that he was violating the laws of God and man. It was established that the accused lost his power of control of mind, while committing the offence, a medical report was also produced to that effect.

Judgment:
The court acquitted Mc. Naughten on the grounds of Insanity.

Mc. Naughten Principles of Insanity:

1) Unless the contrary is proved, every man is of sound mind and he knows that he is responsible for his crime.

page1image3578551504 page1image3578551792

  1. 2)  To plead the defense of insanity, the accused has to prove that, at the time of committing the act, he was suffering a disease of mind.

  2. 3)  If the accused was conscious at the time of the act, he is punishable.

  3. 4)  The accused is not punishable, if he kills a person in a suspicion that the

    person was attempting to kill him.
    The accused is punishable, if he kills a person in a suspicion that the person was attempting to do serious injury.

  4. 5)  A medical witness, who has not seen the accused before the trial should not be asked to give his opinion on the accused mind.

    Ingredients:

Insanity or unsoundness of mind itself is not a defense.

To plead Insanity as a defense, the following conditions has to be satisfied, they are:

  1. 1)  The accused is of unsound mind.

  2. 2)  that he does not know the nature of the act he was doing

  3. 3)  that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law

  4. 4)  Burden of Proof is on the shoulders of the accused to plead the defense of

    insanity.

    Types of Insanity:

  1. 1)  Lunatic

  2. 2)  Idiot

  3. 3)  One due to disease and

  4. 4)  Drunken or intoxicated person.

In Veluswamy V

State
In this case, the accused killed his father with a grinding stone because he refused

to give him the money.
The court denied the defense of Insanity on the grounds that the accused was in full sense while committing the offence.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Types of Punishments

Punishments: The punishments, to which the offenders are liable under the provisions of Indian Penal Code 1860, are: 1) Death Penalty or Capital Punishment 2) Life Imprisonment 3) Imprisonment a) Rigorous b) Simple 4) Forfeiture 5) Fine 1. Death Penalty or Capital Punishment: It is the most serious nature of punishment. Some Countries abolished it. It is awarded in India in certain exceptional cases. The offences which are punishable with death sentence under the Indian Penal code includes: a) Waging war against the Government of India (Sec-121) b) Abetting Mutiny that is actually committed (Sec-132) c) Giving or Fabricating false Evidence upon which an innocent person suffers death (Sec-194) d) Murder (Sec- 302) e) Abetment of Suicide of a minor or of a insane or of an intoxicated person (Sec-305) f) Attempt to Murder by a person under the sentence of Imprisonment for life, if hurt is caused (Sec-307) g) Punishment for repeat offenders (previously convicted for an offence punishable u...
Post a Comment
Read more

Right of Private defence

The Right of Private defense: (Section 96 to 106): One of the fundamental principles of law is that every individual has a right to defend himself and his property. This is the doctrine of self-defense or self-preservation. Sec. 96 to 106 has recognized this rule and have provided for the limits within which it may be exercised. This may be discussed under two heads: a) Right of person b) Right of property 1. Right of person: A) Every person has a right to defend his own body and the body of any other person against any person. (Sec-97) B) Against a madman etc: The right extends in all circumstances against anyperson who is insane, drunk or who by a reason of youth immaturity is excused under law (Sec- 98) Eg: Z under madness attempts to kill A.A may defend and even kill Z if circumstances so warrant. C) Extension of the right: Sec-100 provides as follows :A person who is under a reasonable apprehension that his life is in danger,may to defend himself, voluntarily cause the death of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY, RIOT, AFFRAY

Unlawful Assembly (Section 141): Unlawful assembly is an assembly of 5 or more persons with the common object: 1)  to over-throw by criminal force the Government or the legislature or 2)  To resist the execution of any legal process 3)  To commit mischief (Sec-425), criminal trespass (441) 4)  To obtain property or right by criminal force or 5)  To criminally force a person to do an act which he is not bound to do, or to force him not to do an act which he is bound to do. If a person is a member of an unlawful assembly then that person is punishable. An assembly which is not unlawful in the beginning may become unlawful subsequently. The purpose or common object decides the nature of the assembly. Essentials: 1)  The essentials are that there should be five or more persons and there should be the common object as specified in Sec-141. 2)  This is different from common intention in Sec-34. For unlawful assembly prior meeting of minds is not essential. 3...
Post a Comment
Read more