Skip to main content

UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY, RIOT, AFFRAY

Unlawful Assembly (Section 141):

Unlawful assembly is an assembly of 5 or more persons with the common object:

  1. 1)  to over-throw by criminal force the Government or the legislature or

  2. 2)  To resist the execution of any legal process

  3. 3)  To commit mischief (Sec-425), criminal trespass (441)

  4. 4)  To obtain property or right by criminal force or

  5. 5)  To criminally force a person to do an act which he is not bound to do, or to

    force him not to do an act which he is bound to do.

    If a person is a member of an unlawful assembly then that person is punishable.

An assembly which is not unlawful in the beginning may become unlawful subsequently.
The purpose or common object decides the nature of the assembly.

Essentials:

  1. 1)  The essentials are that there should be five or more persons and there should be the common object as specified in Sec-141.

  2. 2)  This is different from common intention in Sec-34.
    For unlawful assembly prior meeting of minds is not essential.

  3. 3)  To be called a "member" of the unlawful assembly the person must have joined knowing the facts, intentionally or continued in it.

    Punishments:

The punishment for being a member is 6 months imprisonment, fine or both.

In Chikkarange Gowda V

State of Mysore
The Supreme Court laid down the essentials of unlawful assembly.

There should be the minimum of 5 members & they should have the common object of Sec- 141.
The members should know that they are likely to commit an offence, in furtherance of the common object.

The prosecution should prove the presence or participation of the member in the unlawful assembly.

Riot (Section 46):

This means if an unlawful assembly or a member in pursuance of common object, uses force or violence, then every member is guilty of Rioting.

(Unlawful assembly +force = Riot)
Unlawful assembly is an assembly of 
5 or more persons with the common object:

  1. 1)  to over-throw by criminal force the Government or the legislature or

  2. 2)  To resist the execution of any legal process

  3. 3)  To commit mischief (Sec-425), criminal trespass (441)

  4. 4)  To obtain property or right by criminal force or

  5. 5)  To criminally force a person to do an act which he is not bound to do, or to force him not to do an act which he is bound to do.

If a person is a member of an unlawful assembly then that person is punishable. An assembly which is not unlawful in the beginning may become unlawful subsequently.

The purpose or common object decides the nature of the assembly.
To be called a "member" of the unlawful assembly the person must have joined knowing the facts, intentionally or continued in it.

Affray (Sec-159):

If 2 or more persons, fight in a public place, disturb .public peace, they are guilty of affray. The punishment is imprisonment for one month or fine up to Rs.100/- or both.

Affray means to terrify i.e., it creates a terror to the public.
Actual fighting is necessary.
Mere quarrel with some words or threatening words will not amount to affray. There must be physical 
exchange of blows.
Fighting at public taps, or public urinals are examples.
The place must be a public place.

Affray is different from Riot. For affray there should be or more persons. For rioting there should be or more persons.

Riot may be in a private place, but affray should be in public place

In Jagannath's case,

2 brothers were quarreling on a public road using abusive language. A large crowd gathered and the traffic was jammed.
It was held that, no affray as there was no "fighting" by the brothers.
Fight is a bilateral act and fighting by both parties is essential.

In Ellappa V

Ellappa

A washer man was beaten, in public place, but there was submission by washer man that he was crying but was not fighting back. Held, there was no fight, hence, no affray. It was only an assault.

page3image40115424

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THEFT (Section 378)

  THEFT (Section 378) Sec-378 Indian Penal Code defines theft. A person is guilty of theft is he takes with dishonest intention, any moveable property, out of the possession of any person, without his consent and moves with the property. 1)  If an item is attached to the earth, it cannot be stolen, but if it is freed from the earth it may be stolen. 2)  Moving the property is essential. Removing an obstacle amounts to theft. Eg: 1) A cuts down a -tree from the field of Z with a view to dishonestly taking the 2) tree. He has committed theft. A meets a bullock cart carrying valuable articles, he causes it to be moved in a different direction with a dishonest intention to take it. This is theft. Essentials: 1. Dishonest taking. 2. Moveable property 3. Out of the possession of the person 4. Without consent 5. Moving with the property 1. Dishonest Taking: The dishonest intention is the gist of the offense. The accused must make wrongful gain or wrongful loss. The taking must b...

Types of Punishments

Punishments: The punishments, to which the offenders are liable under the provisions of Indian Penal Code 1860, are: 1) Death Penalty or Capital Punishment 2) Life Imprisonment 3) Imprisonment a) Rigorous b) Simple 4) Forfeiture 5) Fine 1. Death Penalty or Capital Punishment: It is the most serious nature of punishment. Some Countries abolished it. It is awarded in India in certain exceptional cases. The offences which are punishable with death sentence under the Indian Penal code includes: a) Waging war against the Government of India (Sec-121) b) Abetting Mutiny that is actually committed (Sec-132) c) Giving or Fabricating false Evidence upon which an innocent person suffers death (Sec-194) d) Murder (Sec- 302) e) Abetment of Suicide of a minor or of a insane or of an intoxicated person (Sec-305) f) Attempt to Murder by a person under the sentence of Imprisonment for life, if hurt is caused (Sec-307) g) Punishment for repeat offenders (previously convicted for an offence punishable u...