Skip to main content

Law relating to Abetment (Section 107 to 120)

Law relating to Abetment explanation and also when an abetment committed outside India is said to be an offence committed in India?

Abetment: (Section 107 to 120):

A person abets the doing of a thing if he:

1) Instigates another to do that thing, or

2) Conspires with others in the doing of-the act or

3) Intentionally aids the doing of that thing

E.g: A, a police officer, with a Warrant is empowered to arrest Z. B, who knew this, instigated A to arrest C who he mis-represented as Z. A arrests C. B abets.


General advice is not abetment.

Abetment by instigation:

Instigation means the instigator actively suggests, or stimulates by any means i.e., by words, hints, encouragement etc.

Abetment by conspiracy:

For this there should be at least two persons, engaged in commission of an act in pursuance of conspiracy and there should be the doing of the thing.

Abetment by aid:

The person aids to facilitate commission of an offence. It should be intentional aid. E.g: supplying of food to facilitate an offence. A police man A, who stands and does nothing to prevent torture of B by C, is guilty of abetment by omission i. e, non interference.

Abettor: (Section 108)

An abettor is a person who abets.

a) Either by the commission of the offence or

b) The commission of an act which would be an offence if done by a person capable by law of committing the offence with intention or knowledge of that of the abettor.


Scope:-

1) Abetment of an illegal omission amounts of an offence

2) Abetted act need not be committed, to constitute an offence

 Eg:

a) A abets B to murder C. B refuses to do so. A is guilty of abetting B to murder.

b) A instigates B to murder D. B thereupon stabs D. But, D recovers. A is Guilty of instigating B to murder.

3) The abetment of an offence is an offence. Hence, an abetment of such an abetment is also an offence.

Eg:

A instigate C to murder D. B accordingly instigates C who commits murder of D. B is guilty and punishable under 302 of I.P.C, A has instigated. Hence, A is also liable for the same punishment.

Explanation:

It is not necessary that the person abetted should be capable of committing a crime. A child, a lunatic etc. may be used by the abettor to do the crime. In such cases, the abettor is guilty of the offence committed through the child, lunatic etc.

Eg:

'A with guilty intention abets a child of 5 years to set fire to a house, of B. B, is grievously hurt. A is liable. When an abetment committed outside India is said to be an offence committed in India:

Sec-108A is added to IPC 1860 by the 4th Amendment Act of 1898 (Sec-3).

It deals with the commission of an offence outside India as a consequence or in the pursuance of the abetment that took place in India. In such cases, both the abettor in India and the principal offender, who committed the offence outside India, are punishable as per the IPC in India. A person abets an offence within the meaning of this code, who in India abets the commission of any act beyond India which would constitute an offence if committed in India.

Eg: A in India, instigates B, a foreigner in London, to commit a murder in London. A is guilty of abetting the murder. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Types of Punishments

Punishments: The punishments, to which the offenders are liable under the provisions of Indian Penal Code 1860, are: 1) Death Penalty or Capital Punishment 2) Life Imprisonment 3) Imprisonment a) Rigorous b) Simple 4) Forfeiture 5) Fine 1. Death Penalty or Capital Punishment: It is the most serious nature of punishment. Some Countries abolished it. It is awarded in India in certain exceptional cases. The offences which are punishable with death sentence under the Indian Penal code includes: a) Waging war against the Government of India (Sec-121) b) Abetting Mutiny that is actually committed (Sec-132) c) Giving or Fabricating false Evidence upon which an innocent person suffers death (Sec-194) d) Murder (Sec- 302) e) Abetment of Suicide of a minor or of a insane or of an intoxicated person (Sec-305) f) Attempt to Murder by a person under the sentence of Imprisonment for life, if hurt is caused (Sec-307) g) Punishment for repeat offenders (previously convicted for an offence punishable u...
Post a Comment
Read more

Theories of Punishment

 Theories of Punishment: Imposing punishment upon the wrong doer was recognized from the time of immemorial. In olden days, severe punishment was imposed for smaller offence. As the civilization developed, the attitude towards the imposing of the punishment has been changed. Gandhi said, “Hate the Sin, but not the Sinner” Like this, other philosophers showed mercy upon the criminals and started analyzing the Socio-economic circumstances behind the incident of the offence. Their views are classified into: 1) Deterrent Theory 2) Retributive Theory 3) Reformative Theory 4) Preventive Theory 5) Expiatory Theory 1. Deterrent Theory: According to this theory, the punishment given to a wrong doer must be as hard as possible so that it may set an example who commits the same. That is, it not only punishes a particular person but it also directs punishment to the other possible criminals. The deterrent theory creates some kind of fear in the mind of other by providing an adequate penalty an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Article 15 (Prohibition of discrimination)

Article – 15 Prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth: When a law comes within the prohibition of Article-15, it cannot be validated without Article-14 by applying the principle of reasonable classification. There are 5 clauses under Article-15, they are: 15(1) The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on the grounds  only of Religions, Race, Caste, Sex, Place of birth or any of them. 15(2) No citizen shall on the grounds only of Religions, Race, Caste, Sex,  Place of birth or any of them, be the subject of any of the disability,  liability, restrictions or any condition with regard to: Access to shops, public restaurants, hotels and any places of public entertainment or The use of Wells, tanks, Bathing Ghats, Roads and the places of public resort maintained wholly or partially out of state funds or is dedicated to the use of general public. 15(3) Nothing in this Article shall prevent the state ...
Post a Comment
Read more