Skip to main content

Law relating to Abetment (Section 107 to 120)

Law relating to Abetment explanation and also when an abetment committed outside India is said to be an offence committed in India?

Abetment: (Section 107 to 120):

A person abets the doing of a thing if he:

1) Instigates another to do that thing, or

2) Conspires with others in the doing of-the act or

3) Intentionally aids the doing of that thing

E.g: A, a police officer, with a Warrant is empowered to arrest Z. B, who knew this, instigated A to arrest C who he mis-represented as Z. A arrests C. B abets.


General advice is not abetment.

Abetment by instigation:

Instigation means the instigator actively suggests, or stimulates by any means i.e., by words, hints, encouragement etc.

Abetment by conspiracy:

For this there should be at least two persons, engaged in commission of an act in pursuance of conspiracy and there should be the doing of the thing.

Abetment by aid:

The person aids to facilitate commission of an offence. It should be intentional aid. E.g: supplying of food to facilitate an offence. A police man A, who stands and does nothing to prevent torture of B by C, is guilty of abetment by omission i. e, non interference.

Abettor: (Section 108)

An abettor is a person who abets.

a) Either by the commission of the offence or

b) The commission of an act which would be an offence if done by a person capable by law of committing the offence with intention or knowledge of that of the abettor.


Scope:-

1) Abetment of an illegal omission amounts of an offence

2) Abetted act need not be committed, to constitute an offence

 Eg:

a) A abets B to murder C. B refuses to do so. A is guilty of abetting B to murder.

b) A instigates B to murder D. B thereupon stabs D. But, D recovers. A is Guilty of instigating B to murder.

3) The abetment of an offence is an offence. Hence, an abetment of such an abetment is also an offence.

Eg:

A instigate C to murder D. B accordingly instigates C who commits murder of D. B is guilty and punishable under 302 of I.P.C, A has instigated. Hence, A is also liable for the same punishment.

Explanation:

It is not necessary that the person abetted should be capable of committing a crime. A child, a lunatic etc. may be used by the abettor to do the crime. In such cases, the abettor is guilty of the offence committed through the child, lunatic etc.

Eg:

'A with guilty intention abets a child of 5 years to set fire to a house, of B. B, is grievously hurt. A is liable. When an abetment committed outside India is said to be an offence committed in India:

Sec-108A is added to IPC 1860 by the 4th Amendment Act of 1898 (Sec-3).

It deals with the commission of an offence outside India as a consequence or in the pursuance of the abetment that took place in India. In such cases, both the abettor in India and the principal offender, who committed the offence outside India, are punishable as per the IPC in India. A person abets an offence within the meaning of this code, who in India abets the commission of any act beyond India which would constitute an offence if committed in India.

Eg: A in India, instigates B, a foreigner in London, to commit a murder in London. A is guilty of abetting the murder. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Types of Punishments

Punishments: The punishments, to which the offenders are liable under the provisions of Indian Penal Code 1860, are: 1) Death Penalty or Capital Punishment 2) Life Imprisonment 3) Imprisonment a) Rigorous b) Simple 4) Forfeiture 5) Fine 1. Death Penalty or Capital Punishment: It is the most serious nature of punishment. Some Countries abolished it. It is awarded in India in certain exceptional cases. The offences which are punishable with death sentence under the Indian Penal code includes: a) Waging war against the Government of India (Sec-121) b) Abetting Mutiny that is actually committed (Sec-132) c) Giving or Fabricating false Evidence upon which an innocent person suffers death (Sec-194) d) Murder (Sec- 302) e) Abetment of Suicide of a minor or of a insane or of an intoxicated person (Sec-305) f) Attempt to Murder by a person under the sentence of Imprisonment for life, if hurt is caused (Sec-307) g) Punishment for repeat offenders (previously convicted for an offence punishable u...
Post a Comment
Read more

UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY, RIOT, AFFRAY

Unlawful Assembly (Section 141): Unlawful assembly is an assembly of 5 or more persons with the common object: 1)  to over-throw by criminal force the Government or the legislature or 2)  To resist the execution of any legal process 3)  To commit mischief (Sec-425), criminal trespass (441) 4)  To obtain property or right by criminal force or 5)  To criminally force a person to do an act which he is not bound to do, or to force him not to do an act which he is bound to do. If a person is a member of an unlawful assembly then that person is punishable. An assembly which is not unlawful in the beginning may become unlawful subsequently. The purpose or common object decides the nature of the assembly. Essentials: 1)  The essentials are that there should be five or more persons and there should be the common object as specified in Sec-141. 2)  This is different from common intention in Sec-34. For unlawful assembly prior meeting of minds is not essential. 3...
Post a Comment
Read more

Right of Private defence

The Right of Private defense: (Section 96 to 106): One of the fundamental principles of law is that every individual has a right to defend himself and his property. This is the doctrine of self-defense or self-preservation. Sec. 96 to 106 has recognized this rule and have provided for the limits within which it may be exercised. This may be discussed under two heads: a) Right of person b) Right of property 1. Right of person: A) Every person has a right to defend his own body and the body of any other person against any person. (Sec-97) B) Against a madman etc: The right extends in all circumstances against anyperson who is insane, drunk or who by a reason of youth immaturity is excused under law (Sec- 98) Eg: Z under madness attempts to kill A.A may defend and even kill Z if circumstances so warrant. C) Extension of the right: Sec-100 provides as follows :A person who is under a reasonable apprehension that his life is in danger,may to defend himself, voluntarily cause the death of th...
Post a Comment
Read more