Skip to main content

Criminal Trespass notes

Criminal Trespass (Section 441 to Section 462):

If a person enters upon the property in the possession of another, with an intention to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy any person he commits criminal trespass.

If having lawfully entered he remains there unlawfully and commits an offence, he is guilty of criminal trespass. Use of criminal force, is not essential. The intention is aiming at the desired object or motive

Eg:

A landlord who forcibly enters his land in the possession of his tenant B, to beat B, A commits criminal trespass.


Punishment Section 447:

Imprisonment up to 3 months or fine of Rs.500/- or both.

In Harish Chandra

V

 State

In this case, the workers of the factory entered into the office of the Managing director with Deadly weapons.

They raised slogans and also beat the staff.

It was held that the accused workers were guilty of Criminal trespass.

House trespass (Section 442):

If a person enters into or upon the property of another with an intention to commit an offence, he is guilty of criminal trespass. A person who lawfully enters but who stays unlawfully may have an intention to commit an offence; he is guilty of criminal trespass.

If a person commits criminal trespass by entering into or remaining in any building, tent or vessel or place used for worship, he is guilty of house trespass. The introduction of any part of the body of the accused is sufficient.

Lurking house trespass (Section 443):

A person, who commits house trespass taking precautions to conceal himself, is guilty of lurking house trespass. The accused should have taken active steps and means to conceal his presence. It becomes lurking house trespass by night if he conceals after sunset but before sunrise (Sec-444).

House breaking (Section 445):

A person is guilty of house breaking, if he enters the house through an entrance, in any of the six ways:

1) A passage made by himself

Eg: A makes a hole through the wall and puts his hand.

2) Through a passage which he had opened, which passage is not intended for human entrance. He may enter by scaling or climbing over the wall.

Eg: A enters by breaking the window or by breaking open the door. This is house-breaking.

3) Any passage which he has opened to commit house trespass by any means, by which that passage was not intended by the occupier of the house to be opened.

Eg: A enters B's house in the evening through the main door but after committing theft he leaves the house by opening an inner door, which had been fastened by the owner. This is house-breaking,

4) If the offender enters by opening any lock.

5) The offender enters by using criminal force or committing assault or threatening to commit assault.

Eg: X is standing in his doorway. A knocks him down and enters the house to commit house trespass.

6) The offender enters or quits by any passage which he knows to have been fastened.

Eg: A enters B's house through a door after opening it.


Punishment:

Punishment for lurking house, trespass & house-breaking in Section 453 to 461of IPC depends on the nature of the description given in them.

In Chellappan

V

State of Kerala

The accused, with dangerous weapons, had entered a wireless station & was concealing.It was held that, there was lurking house trespass & hence guilty under Section 455.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Essentials of Forgery

Forgery: (Section 463) There are two sections defining forgery. 1) Sec- 463 defines forgery 2) Sec- 464 defines Making a false document 1. Forgery: A person who makes a false document or part of it with an intention: 1) to cause damage or injury to the public or to any person 2) to support any claim or title 3) to cause any person to part with property or enter into contract 4) to commit fraud or that fraud may be committed - is guilty of forgery; 2. False Document: A person is said to make a false document in the following circumstances: 1) He must dishonestly or fraudulently, make, sign, seal or execute a document, with knowledge or an intention to make others believe that it was genuinely done by the concerned authority. 2) The person, without lawful authority, dishonestly or fraudulently cancels, or alters the document made by himself or by any other (living or not). 3) The person may cause any other person who is insane or intoxicated or deceived, to sign or seal or execute or alt...

Types of Punishments

Punishments: The punishments, to which the offenders are liable under the provisions of Indian Penal Code 1860, are: 1) Death Penalty or Capital Punishment 2) Life Imprisonment 3) Imprisonment a) Rigorous b) Simple 4) Forfeiture 5) Fine 1. Death Penalty or Capital Punishment: It is the most serious nature of punishment. Some Countries abolished it. It is awarded in India in certain exceptional cases. The offences which are punishable with death sentence under the Indian Penal code includes: a) Waging war against the Government of India (Sec-121) b) Abetting Mutiny that is actually committed (Sec-132) c) Giving or Fabricating false Evidence upon which an innocent person suffers death (Sec-194) d) Murder (Sec- 302) e) Abetment of Suicide of a minor or of a insane or of an intoxicated person (Sec-305) f) Attempt to Murder by a person under the sentence of Imprisonment for life, if hurt is caused (Sec-307) g) Punishment for repeat offenders (previously convicted for an offence punishable u...

Theories of Punishment

 Theories of Punishment: Imposing punishment upon the wrong doer was recognized from the time of immemorial. In olden days, severe punishment was imposed for smaller offence. As the civilization developed, the attitude towards the imposing of the punishment has been changed. Gandhi said, “Hate the Sin, but not the Sinner” Like this, other philosophers showed mercy upon the criminals and started analyzing the Socio-economic circumstances behind the incident of the offence. Their views are classified into: 1) Deterrent Theory 2) Retributive Theory 3) Reformative Theory 4) Preventive Theory 5) Expiatory Theory 1. Deterrent Theory: According to this theory, the punishment given to a wrong doer must be as hard as possible so that it may set an example who commits the same. That is, it not only punishes a particular person but it also directs punishment to the other possible criminals. The deterrent theory creates some kind of fear in the mind of other by providing an adequate penalty an...