Skip to main content

Criminal Trespass notes

Criminal Trespass (Section 441 to Section 462):

If a person enters upon the property in the possession of another, with an intention to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy any person he commits criminal trespass.

If having lawfully entered he remains there unlawfully and commits an offence, he is guilty of criminal trespass. Use of criminal force, is not essential. The intention is aiming at the desired object or motive

Eg:

A landlord who forcibly enters his land in the possession of his tenant B, to beat B, A commits criminal trespass.


Punishment Section 447:

Imprisonment up to 3 months or fine of Rs.500/- or both.

In Harish Chandra

V

 State

In this case, the workers of the factory entered into the office of the Managing director with Deadly weapons.

They raised slogans and also beat the staff.

It was held that the accused workers were guilty of Criminal trespass.

House trespass (Section 442):

If a person enters into or upon the property of another with an intention to commit an offence, he is guilty of criminal trespass. A person who lawfully enters but who stays unlawfully may have an intention to commit an offence; he is guilty of criminal trespass.

If a person commits criminal trespass by entering into or remaining in any building, tent or vessel or place used for worship, he is guilty of house trespass. The introduction of any part of the body of the accused is sufficient.

Lurking house trespass (Section 443):

A person, who commits house trespass taking precautions to conceal himself, is guilty of lurking house trespass. The accused should have taken active steps and means to conceal his presence. It becomes lurking house trespass by night if he conceals after sunset but before sunrise (Sec-444).

House breaking (Section 445):

A person is guilty of house breaking, if he enters the house through an entrance, in any of the six ways:

1) A passage made by himself

Eg: A makes a hole through the wall and puts his hand.

2) Through a passage which he had opened, which passage is not intended for human entrance. He may enter by scaling or climbing over the wall.

Eg: A enters by breaking the window or by breaking open the door. This is house-breaking.

3) Any passage which he has opened to commit house trespass by any means, by which that passage was not intended by the occupier of the house to be opened.

Eg: A enters B's house in the evening through the main door but after committing theft he leaves the house by opening an inner door, which had been fastened by the owner. This is house-breaking,

4) If the offender enters by opening any lock.

5) The offender enters by using criminal force or committing assault or threatening to commit assault.

Eg: X is standing in his doorway. A knocks him down and enters the house to commit house trespass.

6) The offender enters or quits by any passage which he knows to have been fastened.

Eg: A enters B's house through a door after opening it.


Punishment:

Punishment for lurking house, trespass & house-breaking in Section 453 to 461of IPC depends on the nature of the description given in them.

In Chellappan

V

State of Kerala

The accused, with dangerous weapons, had entered a wireless station & was concealing.It was held that, there was lurking house trespass & hence guilty under Section 455.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Theories of Punishment

 Theories of Punishment: Imposing punishment upon the wrong doer was recognized from the time of immemorial. In olden days, severe punishment was imposed for smaller offence. As the civilization developed, the attitude towards the imposing of the punishment has been changed. Gandhi said, “Hate the Sin, but not the Sinner” Like this, other philosophers showed mercy upon the criminals and started analyzing the Socio-economic circumstances behind the incident of the offence. Their views are classified into: 1) Deterrent Theory 2) Retributive Theory 3) Reformative Theory 4) Preventive Theory 5) Expiatory Theory 1. Deterrent Theory: According to this theory, the punishment given to a wrong doer must be as hard as possible so that it may set an example who commits the same. That is, it not only punishes a particular person but it also directs punishment to the other possible criminals. The deterrent theory creates some kind of fear in the mind of other by providing an adequate penalty an...

Grievous hurt

Hurt (Section 319): Whoever causes bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person is said to cause a hurt. Grievous Hurt (Section 320): According to Sec-320, Any of the following 8 instances come under the Grievous hurt, they are: 1) Emasculation 2) Permanent privation of the sight of either eye. 3) Permanent privation of the hearing of either ear. 4) Privation of any member or joint. 5) Destruction or permanent impairing of the powers of any member or joint. 6) Permanent disfiguration of the head or face. 7) Fracture or dislocation of a bone or tooth. 8) Any hurt which endangers life or which causes the sufferer to be during the space of twenty days in sever bodily pain, or unable to follow his ordinary pursuits. 1. Emasculation Emasculation means deprivation of masculine vigor or castration. Emasculation is unsexing a man. 2. Permanent privation of the sight of either eye: The privation of the sight of either eye must be permanent. Temporary privation of sight, therefore, does not a...

Right of Private defence

The Right of Private defense: (Section 96 to 106): One of the fundamental principles of law is that every individual has a right to defend himself and his property. This is the doctrine of self-defense or self-preservation. Sec. 96 to 106 has recognized this rule and have provided for the limits within which it may be exercised. This may be discussed under two heads: a) Right of person b) Right of property 1. Right of person: A) Every person has a right to defend his own body and the body of any other person against any person. (Sec-97) B) Against a madman etc: The right extends in all circumstances against anyperson who is insane, drunk or who by a reason of youth immaturity is excused under law (Sec- 98) Eg: Z under madness attempts to kill A.A may defend and even kill Z if circumstances so warrant. C) Extension of the right: Sec-100 provides as follows :A person who is under a reasonable apprehension that his life is in danger,may to defend himself, voluntarily cause the death of th...