Skip to main content

Mistake of law and Mistake of fact

Mistake of law and Mistake of fact: Section 76 and 79:

One of the cardinal rules of criminal law is:

Ignorantia facti excusat, ignorantia juris non excusat

Which means, Ignorance of fact is an excuse but not the Ignorance of law?

This rule is contained in Sec-76 and 79.

According to Sec-76, a person who believes in himself to be bound by the law is excused if he does an act under mistake of fact but not under the mistake of law.

'Mistake' is a slip made not by design but by mischance. It is an error that results from unintentional act or omission. Hence, mistake of fact is considered a good defense.



E.g.

1) 'A' a soldier fires on a mob by the orders of the Superior officers as per law. A is not guilty.

2) A, a police officer, arrests Z, believing, in good faith that he is the person required. He is not guilty.

In R

V

 Tolson

Mrs.Tolson was charged with Bigamy as she had married an icon husband. Her defense was that Mr.Tolson, her first husband could not be traced for over seven years despite all reasonable means to search adopted. There was not men’s rea.Hence, it was held that she was not guilty. 'Mistake of the fact is an excuse' the court declared.

In R

V

 Prince

The accused was charged with kidnapping Annie Phillips, a girl under 16 years of age.

The plea of the accused that the girl looked to be above 16 was rejected by the court and he was held guilty. His reasonable belief as to her age was no legal defense.

According to Sec-79, an act done by a person, who believes in himself to be justified by law, is excused. However, ignorance of law is no excuse but mistake of fact in good faith is an excuse.

1) A, a police officer sees Z commit an offence which appears to be murder. A, in good faith exercise his powers under Cr. P.C. arrests Z. It turns out that there was no murder. It was Held that Z is not guilty as he is justified by Saw.

2) A. a police constable, saw B carrying, three pieces of cloth, suspected them to be stolen and questioned him, B gave no satisfactory answers. Hence, he arrested him, but the Inspector released him. B prosecuted the constable for wrongful confinement. It was Held that, constable is not guilty. There was a mistake of fact that the Constable was justified by law to enquire B.

In Chirangi

 V

 State

Accused in "delusion" took his son as tiger and killed him. He was protected under Sec-79.

In Ram Bahadur

V

 State of Orissa

 Killing a person as ghost was excused in the set of circumstances of the case

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Types of Punishments

Punishments: The punishments, to which the offenders are liable under the provisions of Indian Penal Code 1860, are: 1) Death Penalty or Capital Punishment 2) Life Imprisonment 3) Imprisonment a) Rigorous b) Simple 4) Forfeiture 5) Fine 1. Death Penalty or Capital Punishment: It is the most serious nature of punishment. Some Countries abolished it. It is awarded in India in certain exceptional cases. The offences which are punishable with death sentence under the Indian Penal code includes: a) Waging war against the Government of India (Sec-121) b) Abetting Mutiny that is actually committed (Sec-132) c) Giving or Fabricating false Evidence upon which an innocent person suffers death (Sec-194) d) Murder (Sec- 302) e) Abetment of Suicide of a minor or of a insane or of an intoxicated person (Sec-305) f) Attempt to Murder by a person under the sentence of Imprisonment for life, if hurt is caused (Sec-307) g) Punishment for repeat offenders (previously convicted for an offence punishable u...
Post a Comment
Read more

Essentials of Forgery

Forgery: (Section 463) There are two sections defining forgery. 1) Sec- 463 defines forgery 2) Sec- 464 defines Making a false document 1. Forgery: A person who makes a false document or part of it with an intention: 1) to cause damage or injury to the public or to any person 2) to support any claim or title 3) to cause any person to part with property or enter into contract 4) to commit fraud or that fraud may be committed - is guilty of forgery; 2. False Document: A person is said to make a false document in the following circumstances: 1) He must dishonestly or fraudulently, make, sign, seal or execute a document, with knowledge or an intention to make others believe that it was genuinely done by the concerned authority. 2) The person, without lawful authority, dishonestly or fraudulently cancels, or alters the document made by himself or by any other (living or not). 3) The person may cause any other person who is insane or intoxicated or deceived, to sign or seal or execute or alt...
Post a Comment
Read more

Theories of Punishment

 Theories of Punishment: Imposing punishment upon the wrong doer was recognized from the time of immemorial. In olden days, severe punishment was imposed for smaller offence. As the civilization developed, the attitude towards the imposing of the punishment has been changed. Gandhi said, “Hate the Sin, but not the Sinner” Like this, other philosophers showed mercy upon the criminals and started analyzing the Socio-economic circumstances behind the incident of the offence. Their views are classified into: 1) Deterrent Theory 2) Retributive Theory 3) Reformative Theory 4) Preventive Theory 5) Expiatory Theory 1. Deterrent Theory: According to this theory, the punishment given to a wrong doer must be as hard as possible so that it may set an example who commits the same. That is, it not only punishes a particular person but it also directs punishment to the other possible criminals. The deterrent theory creates some kind of fear in the mind of other by providing an adequate penalty an...
Post a Comment
Read more