Skip to main content

False Evidence

Giving False Evidence: (Section 191)

According to Sec-191 'giving false evidence' is an offence punishable under Indian Penal Code.In English Law according to Kenny this is perjury.If a person in a judicial proceeding, before a competent court, gives false evidence or evidence which he knows to be false he is guilty of perjury. But he must have stated this under oath and on matters material to the trial.

Sec-191, defines giving false evidence.

Here the accused must be legally bound by an oath to state the truth or to make a declaration. He must make a false statement and must know that it is false or that it is not true. The statement may be made either orally or in writing.

It amounts to false evidence:

1) If a person says that he believes a thing which he does not believe,

2) If he states that he knows a thing which he does not believe, or

3) If he states that he knows a thing which he does not know.


Ranjit Singh

V

 State

The facts were that the accused Police Officer filed an affidavit, stating that Ranjit was never arrested and illegally detailed in custody. The Supreme Court held that as his statements were found to be false the accused had committed an offence under this section.

Eg.

1) A, under an oath stated that he believes that a signature to be in the handwriting of Z, knowing well that it is not so. This is false evidence.

2) A, under an oath tells the court that Z was not present at a particular place on a particular day. He knows that this is not true. This is false evidence.

3) A, under an oath, translates a statement knowing that the translation was false.

Making false affidavit, amounts to giving false evidence. Sec-193 provides for punishment.

Punishment (Sec-193):

Sec-193 provides punishment for giving false evidence with an Imprisonment up to 7years along with fine.

Fabricating False Evidence: (Sec-192)

This is an offence under I.P.C. The essentials are three:

1) The accused makes a false entry in any book or record or make any false document.

2) He must do so with the intention that it may appear in evidence in any court or tribunal.

3) The intention must be that the circumstance may cause an erroneous (bad) opinion in the proceedings.

E.g.:

1) A puts jewels into Z's box with an intention that Z may be convicted of the offence of theft. A has fabricated false evidence.

2) A makes a false entry in his shop book for the purpose of using it in a criminal case.

Rameswar Rai

V

 State

Here, A the accused had stolen railway pins and kept in the house of Z. Z was punished for theft. A was held guilty

Dutt

 V

 State of U. P.

 Here, the accused was an expert witness. He had fabricated a London Diploma Certificate to show he was an expert. He was held guilty.

 Umrao

 V

 State

The witness had made two contradictory statements intentionally. It was held he was guilty of giving false evidence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Types of Punishments

Punishments: The punishments, to which the offenders are liable under the provisions of Indian Penal Code 1860, are: 1) Death Penalty or Capital Punishment 2) Life Imprisonment 3) Imprisonment a) Rigorous b) Simple 4) Forfeiture 5) Fine 1. Death Penalty or Capital Punishment: It is the most serious nature of punishment. Some Countries abolished it. It is awarded in India in certain exceptional cases. The offences which are punishable with death sentence under the Indian Penal code includes: a) Waging war against the Government of India (Sec-121) b) Abetting Mutiny that is actually committed (Sec-132) c) Giving or Fabricating false Evidence upon which an innocent person suffers death (Sec-194) d) Murder (Sec- 302) e) Abetment of Suicide of a minor or of a insane or of an intoxicated person (Sec-305) f) Attempt to Murder by a person under the sentence of Imprisonment for life, if hurt is caused (Sec-307) g) Punishment for repeat offenders (previously convicted for an offence punishable u...

Essentials of Forgery

Forgery: (Section 463) There are two sections defining forgery. 1) Sec- 463 defines forgery 2) Sec- 464 defines Making a false document 1. Forgery: A person who makes a false document or part of it with an intention: 1) to cause damage or injury to the public or to any person 2) to support any claim or title 3) to cause any person to part with property or enter into contract 4) to commit fraud or that fraud may be committed - is guilty of forgery; 2. False Document: A person is said to make a false document in the following circumstances: 1) He must dishonestly or fraudulently, make, sign, seal or execute a document, with knowledge or an intention to make others believe that it was genuinely done by the concerned authority. 2) The person, without lawful authority, dishonestly or fraudulently cancels, or alters the document made by himself or by any other (living or not). 3) The person may cause any other person who is insane or intoxicated or deceived, to sign or seal or execute or alt...

Theories of Punishment

 Theories of Punishment: Imposing punishment upon the wrong doer was recognized from the time of immemorial. In olden days, severe punishment was imposed for smaller offence. As the civilization developed, the attitude towards the imposing of the punishment has been changed. Gandhi said, “Hate the Sin, but not the Sinner” Like this, other philosophers showed mercy upon the criminals and started analyzing the Socio-economic circumstances behind the incident of the offence. Their views are classified into: 1) Deterrent Theory 2) Retributive Theory 3) Reformative Theory 4) Preventive Theory 5) Expiatory Theory 1. Deterrent Theory: According to this theory, the punishment given to a wrong doer must be as hard as possible so that it may set an example who commits the same. That is, it not only punishes a particular person but it also directs punishment to the other possible criminals. The deterrent theory creates some kind of fear in the mind of other by providing an adequate penalty an...