Skip to main content

Mischief

Mischief: (Section 425 to 440)

If a person with an intention to cause wrongful loss or damage to the public or to any person, causes the destruction of the property or causes any change or situation as they will destroy or diminish its value or utility, he is guilty of mischief. The punishment is imprisonment for 3 months or fine or both. The mens-rea (bad intention) in mischief is to cause wrongful loss. The act done is the destruction of property. Sec- 426 to 440 provide for punishment for mischief of various descriptions.

Other forms of mischief are:

Maiming or killing of animal (428 & 429), injury to works of irrigation, water course (430), injury to public road, bridge, river or channel (431) Destruction of house (436) vessel etc

Explanation:

1) It is not essential that the offender should intend to cause loss or damage to the owner of the property injured or destroyed. It is sufficient if he intends to cause, or knows that he is likely to cause wrongful, loss or damage to any person by injuring any property whether it belongs to that person or not.

2) Mischief may be committed by an act affecting property belonging to the person who commits the act, or to that person and others jointly.

Eg:

a) A throws a wrist watch of B voluntarily into a river intending to cause wrongful loss. A is guilty of mischief

b) A burns a valuable security (pronote) belonging to B voluntarily with the intention to cause wrongful loss to him. A is guilty of mischief.

c) A and B are joint owners of a horse. A shoots down the horse and kills it, with a view to cause wrongful loss to B. A is guilty.

In Sukha Singh's case : S received a registered parcel. He took the parcel but tore up the acknowledgement form. It was held that, S is guilty of mischief

In Gopi Naik

V

 Somnath

In this case, the accused had cut the water pipe connection of the complainant. The court held that the accused was guilty of the offence of the mischief.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Types of Punishments

Punishments: The punishments, to which the offenders are liable under the provisions of Indian Penal Code 1860, are: 1) Death Penalty or Capital Punishment 2) Life Imprisonment 3) Imprisonment a) Rigorous b) Simple 4) Forfeiture 5) Fine 1. Death Penalty or Capital Punishment: It is the most serious nature of punishment. Some Countries abolished it. It is awarded in India in certain exceptional cases. The offences which are punishable with death sentence under the Indian Penal code includes: a) Waging war against the Government of India (Sec-121) b) Abetting Mutiny that is actually committed (Sec-132) c) Giving or Fabricating false Evidence upon which an innocent person suffers death (Sec-194) d) Murder (Sec- 302) e) Abetment of Suicide of a minor or of a insane or of an intoxicated person (Sec-305) f) Attempt to Murder by a person under the sentence of Imprisonment for life, if hurt is caused (Sec-307) g) Punishment for repeat offenders (previously convicted for an offence punishable u...
Post a Comment
Read more

Right of Private defence

The Right of Private defense: (Section 96 to 106): One of the fundamental principles of law is that every individual has a right to defend himself and his property. This is the doctrine of self-defense or self-preservation. Sec. 96 to 106 has recognized this rule and have provided for the limits within which it may be exercised. This may be discussed under two heads: a) Right of person b) Right of property 1. Right of person: A) Every person has a right to defend his own body and the body of any other person against any person. (Sec-97) B) Against a madman etc: The right extends in all circumstances against anyperson who is insane, drunk or who by a reason of youth immaturity is excused under law (Sec- 98) Eg: Z under madness attempts to kill A.A may defend and even kill Z if circumstances so warrant. C) Extension of the right: Sec-100 provides as follows :A person who is under a reasonable apprehension that his life is in danger,may to defend himself, voluntarily cause the death of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Theories of Punishment

 Theories of Punishment: Imposing punishment upon the wrong doer was recognized from the time of immemorial. In olden days, severe punishment was imposed for smaller offence. As the civilization developed, the attitude towards the imposing of the punishment has been changed. Gandhi said, “Hate the Sin, but not the Sinner” Like this, other philosophers showed mercy upon the criminals and started analyzing the Socio-economic circumstances behind the incident of the offence. Their views are classified into: 1) Deterrent Theory 2) Retributive Theory 3) Reformative Theory 4) Preventive Theory 5) Expiatory Theory 1. Deterrent Theory: According to this theory, the punishment given to a wrong doer must be as hard as possible so that it may set an example who commits the same. That is, it not only punishes a particular person but it also directs punishment to the other possible criminals. The deterrent theory creates some kind of fear in the mind of other by providing an adequate penalty an...
Post a Comment
Read more