Skip to main content

Territorial jurisdiction and extraterritorial jurisdiction of IPC with exceptions.

 Jurisdiction of Criminal Courts: 

The Jurisdiction of the Criminal Courts is: 

1. Territorial Jurisdiction (Sec-2) 

    a) Personal Jurisdiction 

    b) Intra-Territorial Jurisdiction 

2. Extra- Territorial Jurisdiction 

    a) Extension of the Code to the Extra- Territorial offences (Sec-4(1)) 

    b) Admiral Jurisdiction (Sec-4(2)) 

3. Certain Laws not to be affected by IPC (Sec-5) 

4. Exceptions. 

1. Territorial Jurisdiction: (sec-2) 

It means the power of the state to exercise the jurisdiction within its territory of India. According to sec-2, any person who is found guilty of committing an offence within the territory of India including the territorial waters is punishable. 

The territorial Jurisdiction is divided into 2 types: 

a) Personal Jurisdiction 

b) Intra- Territorial Jurisdiction

a) Personal Jurisdiction: 

According to Sec-2 of IPC1860, “Every person irrespective of his rank, nationality, caste shall be liable for the punishment for the offence committed within the territory of India”. It extends to the foreign nationals also as it makes no distinction between Indian citizen and a foreigner. Eg: Adultery is not an offence in America but an offence in India. 

b) Intra-Territorial Jurisdiction: 

No state allows the other states to exercise the jurisdiction over its territory. Such power of the state to extend the Jurisdiction over the offences committed within the territory is called “Intra- Territorial Jurisdiction”

2. Extra- Territorial Jurisdiction: 

(Sec-3) It means the power of the state to exercise the jurisdiction beyond the territory of India. Sec-3 provides the punishment for the offences committed beyond the territory of India but by law can be tried within India. Sec-3 of IPC provides that, an Indian citizen may be prosecuted in India for the wrong committed in foreign lands, if it is an offence under any of the Indian enactment. Eg: If an Indian commits adultery in America, which is not an offence in America but an offence in India, he may be prosecuted in India. Eg: A who is the citizen of India, commits a murder in Uganda. He can be convicted for murder in any place of India. 

In                 Remia 

                    V 

                Sub-Inspector of police, Tanur 

In this case, an Indian citizen murdered another Indian citizen in a foreign country. The police refused to register an FIR on the grounds that the offence was committed outside India. The court held that the refusal was illegal and directed to register the complaint under sec-3 of IPC.

a) Extension of the code to Extra-Territorial offences (Sec-4): 

Sec-4 provides the extension of the code to Extra-Territorial offences, which are as follows: 

1) Any citizen of India in any place within and beyond India. 

2) Any person on any ship or aircraft registered in India wherever it may be. 

Suppose A committed a murder in India and fled to Pakistan to escape from the punishment. If the state of Pakistan gives him shelter and protects him, such protection and shelter is called “Asylum”. So, A is said to be Asylum. If A is handed over to India by the Pakistan, such handing over of the accused is called “Extradition.” 

b) Admiral Jurisdiction (Sec-4(2)): 

Admiral court is a special court designed to deal with the mercantile and maritime cases. Mercantile cases means, the cases between the merchants or traders. Maritime cases means, Cases pertaining to the offences committed on High Seas including Piracy (robbery committed on ship).

Sec-4 of IPC gives the power to extend their jurisdiction over: 

1) Offences committed on Indian ships on high seas. 

2) Offences committed on foreign ships in Indian Territorial Waters. 

3) Piracy.

3. Certain laws not to be affected by IPC (Sec-5): As per Sec-5, nothing in this act shall affect the provisions of the act for mutiny and for the desertion of the officers, soldiers etc.

 4. Exceptions: The following persons are exempted from the Jurisdiction of the criminal courts they are:

 a) Foreign Soveigns, 

b) Ambassadors, 

c) Alien Enemies, 

d) Foreign Army 

e) Warship 

f) President and Governor. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Offences Relating to Marriage , Adultery and Bigamy

Offences Relating to Marriage (Section 493 to 498): Sec-493 to 498 of IPC deals with the offences relating to the marriages, they are: a) Mock Marriage b) Bigamy c) Adultery 1. Mock Marriage: Mock Marriage means Invalid marriage. It is a sexual intercourse by a man with a married or unmarried woman of any age, whom he induces to be his wife, but in fact he is a concubine. It shall be punished with an Imprisonment up to 10 years and fine. Ingredients: a) The accused has done sexual intercourse with the prosecution. b) He has not legally married to her. c) She has given a consent for sexual intercourse believing that he would marry. d) Such belief in her was induced by the accused. Marriage ceremony fraudulently done without lawful marriage (Sec-496): As per sec-496, Whoever dishonestly or with a fraudulent intention has gone through the ceremony of being married, knowing that he is not been lawfully married, shall be punished with an Imprisonment up to 7 years with fine. Ingredients: a)...
Post a Comment
Read more

Law relating to Abetment (Section 107 to 120)

Law relating to Abetment explanation and also when an abetment committed outside India is said to be an offence committed in India? Abetment: (Section 107 to 120): A person abets the doing of a thing if he: 1) Instigates another to do that thing, or 2) Conspires with others in the doing of-the act or 3) Intentionally aids the doing of that thing E.g: A, a police officer, with a Warrant is empowered to arrest Z. B, who knew this, instigated A to arrest C who he mis-represented as Z. A arrests C. B abets. General advice is not abetment. Abetment by instigation: Instigation means the instigator actively suggests, or stimulates by any means i.e., by words, hints, encouragement etc. Abetment by conspiracy: For this there should be at least two persons, engaged in commission of an act in pursuance of conspiracy and there should be the doing of the thing. Abetment by aid: The person aids to facilitate commission of an offence. It should be intentional aid. E.g: supplying of food to facilitate...
Post a Comment
Read more

UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY, RIOT, AFFRAY

Unlawful Assembly (Section 141): Unlawful assembly is an assembly of 5 or more persons with the common object: 1)  to over-throw by criminal force the Government or the legislature or 2)  To resist the execution of any legal process 3)  To commit mischief (Sec-425), criminal trespass (441) 4)  To obtain property or right by criminal force or 5)  To criminally force a person to do an act which he is not bound to do, or to force him not to do an act which he is bound to do. If a person is a member of an unlawful assembly then that person is punishable. An assembly which is not unlawful in the beginning may become unlawful subsequently. The purpose or common object decides the nature of the assembly. Essentials: 1)  The essentials are that there should be five or more persons and there should be the common object as specified in Sec-141. 2)  This is different from common intention in Sec-34. For unlawful assembly prior meeting of minds is not essential. 3...
Post a Comment
Read more